During the past two weeks, I have read and finished the book, "The Wave" by Todd Strasser. The Wave is about a high school history class, and an experiment the teacher set up so his students could better understand the Nazis. How the Nazis were made and why nobody opposed them in Germany. Before the experiment, the class was very judgemental about it. They couldn't understand how the people of Germany just sat around and let them do the things they did. After they did the experiment, they now understood. This is why I think you can't judge or understand something before you actually experience it yourself. If you put yourself in the actual situation your views may change. You may see the pressure somebody had on them or the pressure they didn't have on them.
Ben Ross, also known as Mr. Ross, is the history teacher in this book that organized the experiment for the students. At the beginning of the book, it starts out with him showing his class a film about the holocaust and the things that happened in them. After seeing the film, his class gets very upset. They get upset because of how horrible the the things they just saw are, and because they don't understand how the people of Germany could just sit around and pretend they didn't know anything and just let that happen. This is the reason Mr. Ross created the experiment. The experiment that he created was to form a group in his history class called, "The Wave". The Wave was supposed to be a group were everybody is equal and is based around discipline, community, and action. Their slogan and motto was; "Strength Through Discipline, Strength Through Community, Strength Through Action". What he didn't expect was the group to get out of control. It spread through the entire school, recruiting every single person they could fine, and threaten or bully any kid that didn't want to join. Much like the Nazis. He wanted them to understand that the idea of the Nazis wasn't so ridiculous and could happen very easily, as they had just demonstrated.
Laurie Sanders, is another main character in the story. She is a senior girl in highschool and in Mr. Ross' history class. She is one of the people at the beginning who don't understand how Germany just let the Nazis run wild and reek havoc and injustice into the world. After the film she said; "How could Germany sit back while the Nazis slaughtered people all around them and say they didn't know about it? How could they do that? How could they even say that?". Laurie soon found out the answer to her questions, via the wave. She saw first hand how the wave swept over and completely conquered the school in days. She saw how powerful it became and how people were too scared to oppose it for fear of what they would do in return. She judged something before she herself had been in that exact situation. She judged it, but didn't really understand the issue since she had never lived through it.
I think this book showed a lot about coming of age. The novel shows how a group of highschoolers were swept into something and had their ignorance and innocence wiped away. It showed them coming to a realization and coming to true terms with the world and with society. This is what I feel like coming of age is all about: coming to terms with things and realizing the truth. This is why I feel this book is a perfect example of a coming of age novel.
The wave is a story that shows us about coming of age, and revealing the truth behind the world. It shows us that we shouldn't judge or try to understand things before we are put into the situation ourselves because we may not have the correct view. We may not know what it was like, what it wasn't like, and so forth. I personally really enjoyed reading this book. This book did only help the characters understand the world and society, but it also taught me these things as well. Never would I have learned this from any other way.
Total Pageviews
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Monday, May 23, 2011
Response to Prompt #14
Becoming an adult is a very hard, exciting, and a confusing thing to a 14 year old kid. To a kid, becoming an adult is ages away, a time that will never come. A time of responsibilities, hardships, and having no fun. Adults are the people that make the rules, that make you come home for dinner when you really just want to stay out with your friends. They are the people that watch over you and the people that are always looking down on you. A 14 year old kid never wants grow old and have to have responsibilities and obey they rules, but they know they eventually have to be. And because kids know they eventually have to grow up, they have many questions and concerns about growing up. I myself, are included in this catagory.
One question that I have about being an adult and growing up is, why? Why do you have to grow up? Why can't we all just stay as kids and play out in the park till we get to tired to move? Some people will say because "you have to grow up eventually, you can't stay young and immature forever, so grow up" others will say "you can't expect your parents to take care of you your entire life so you have to grow up". The first one I really don't understand, why can't a be an immature 40 year old man, huh? Why is it that growing up is always related to becoming less immature and less innocent and becoming more responsible. The second reason I see the reasoning in, I understand the fact that we can't have our parents always there looking out for us. I understand the fact that you can't live with your parents until you grow old and dies. But even if you do move out, even if you move on into the "real world" and start a career for yourself, you're expected to act as an adult and not as a child. I don't understand why a grown man can't act as if he would if he were still in middle school.
This is why I am concerned about growing up, because I don't really know what that means. What growing up means I can do and what it means I can't do. I hate the fact that people expect me to grow up and stop acting childish and immature. I want to stay this way and fun for the rest of my life! This is just how i feel now, though. Maybe in a few years or when I'm all grown up I'll think of it differently, but for now, I'm just going to enjoy being a kid.
One question that I have about being an adult and growing up is, why? Why do you have to grow up? Why can't we all just stay as kids and play out in the park till we get to tired to move? Some people will say because "you have to grow up eventually, you can't stay young and immature forever, so grow up" others will say "you can't expect your parents to take care of you your entire life so you have to grow up". The first one I really don't understand, why can't a be an immature 40 year old man, huh? Why is it that growing up is always related to becoming less immature and less innocent and becoming more responsible. The second reason I see the reasoning in, I understand the fact that we can't have our parents always there looking out for us. I understand the fact that you can't live with your parents until you grow old and dies. But even if you do move out, even if you move on into the "real world" and start a career for yourself, you're expected to act as an adult and not as a child. I don't understand why a grown man can't act as if he would if he were still in middle school.
This is why I am concerned about growing up, because I don't really know what that means. What growing up means I can do and what it means I can't do. I hate the fact that people expect me to grow up and stop acting childish and immature. I want to stay this way and fun for the rest of my life! This is just how i feel now, though. Maybe in a few years or when I'm all grown up I'll think of it differently, but for now, I'm just going to enjoy being a kid.
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
FInal Drafft: Response to starry night
When reading and listening to this poem, I felt and thought a couple of different things. At first, from just reading it once and skimming it over, I didn't think much of it. I just saw it as this lady trying to make a poem deeper that it need being. I just looked at it appeared to look like, and not what was underneath. I had no real interest into seeking the meaning into this poem, because on the first look around it didn't seem too great. After we discussed this poem in class for a while I saw that there was more to it. A lot more. I found out that she had committed suicide. That made my view on this poem change completely. I began to think of this poem as more than just a poem, but as a suicide note. This was her suicide note, her message to the world.
And that got me to thinking all about suicide and her suicide. Maybe this poem is about her trying to tell people how she was feeling, desperately reaching out for someone to understand her and help. She was talking about How she wanted to die, but she writes it like this: "This is how
I want to die"
She makes I want to die it's own separate line. Maybe this is me trying to make everything fit together, but it seemed like she wanted people to know she felt like dying. It makes you wonder though, if she talked to anyone about it, or if she just hoped eventually someone would realize this, if it is actually about this. It’s a really interesting poem after I started thinking about this, still not sure if I like it yet though.
And that got me to thinking all about suicide and her suicide. Maybe this poem is about her trying to tell people how she was feeling, desperately reaching out for someone to understand her and help. She was talking about How she wanted to die, but she writes it like this: "This is how
I want to die"
She makes I want to die it's own separate line. Maybe this is me trying to make everything fit together, but it seemed like she wanted people to know she felt like dying. It makes you wonder though, if she talked to anyone about it, or if she just hoped eventually someone would realize this, if it is actually about this. It’s a really interesting poem after I started thinking about this, still not sure if I like it yet though.
Please Don't Take My Air Jordans
I really liked this poem. I felt like I could relate to it a lot, although i would never kill anyone over a pair of shoes... I can see where he is coming from. In the world, although most people won't admit it, you're judged mainly on how you look. How fly you're looking, or fresh your kicks are looking in this poem's case. When you walk down the street people don't look at you and think, "I bet that guy has a great personality", they think, "wow that guy looks terrible in that poke-a-dot super skinny jeans", or, "wow that guy's pretty hot", and even sometimes, "that guy needs to pick up his pants". We all feel pressured into looking good because we all want to impress the people around us. We all want that new cool thing, those new Air Jordans. We like it when people say that they think that our necklace is pretty, or that our shirt is pretty awesome. The author felt so pressured by all of this, that he took a man's life in order to look good.
Nobody wants to be that guy that has all the old clothes that nobody thinks is cool anymore. You can learn that from just glancing at this poem. He would've lost all of his credit and respect if he didn't get new shoes. He couldn't live with that, so he found a way to get his new shoes without spending a lot of money. Although I do not agree AT ALL with what this person did, I can relate. I can relate to the feeling of trying to look good in order to be accepted. We can all relate to it, and that's why I like this poem.
(I had this saved in my draft folder, I forgot to publish it)
Nobody wants to be that guy that has all the old clothes that nobody thinks is cool anymore. You can learn that from just glancing at this poem. He would've lost all of his credit and respect if he didn't get new shoes. He couldn't live with that, so he found a way to get his new shoes without spending a lot of money. Although I do not agree AT ALL with what this person did, I can relate. I can relate to the feeling of trying to look good in order to be accepted. We can all relate to it, and that's why I like this poem.
(I had this saved in my draft folder, I forgot to publish it)
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Revised Response to Starry Night
When reading and listening to this poem, I felt and thought a couple of different things. At first, from just reading it once and skimming it over, I didn't think much of it. I just saw it as this lady trying to make a poem deeper that it need being. I just looked at it appeared to look like, and not what was underneath. I had no real interest into seeking the meaning into this poem, because on the first look around it didn't seem too great. You know how, when you see someone walking down the street and you kind of size them up and try to tell if they're cool or see if they're wearing some nice shoes? I did that with this poem. I was just sizing it up, and seeing whether it had anything cool going on it. When you see someone walking down the street, you don't know what's underneath though. And the same goes for poems. You have to actually think about it, and go under.
So I decided to read it a second time and see if I could find out more and see if I could find some connection or find some theme. That's when I realized that there was more to this poem than what just meets the eye. I saw a connection between her and Van Gough when he drew the painting and what she thought he was thinking. She created her own version and her own story behind what Van Gough was thinking when he was drawing the painting. They say a picture is worth a thousand words, she tried to sum up those words and make a poem out of it.
Then, after we discussed the poem in class and went even further than we had before, I found it even more. This poem to me, was wrapped in layers, and I had to slowly unwrap each one. I found out she committed suicide. This made my head go spinning. Suicide? And that got me to thinking that maybe this poem was about her suicide. Maybe this poem is about her trying to tell people how she was feeling, desperately reaching out for someone to understand her and help. She was talking about How she wanted to die, but she writes it like this: "This is how
I want to die"
She makes I want to die it's own separate line. Maybe this is me trying to make everything fit together, but it seemed like she wanted people to know she felt like dying.
So I decided to read it a second time and see if I could find out more and see if I could find some connection or find some theme. That's when I realized that there was more to this poem than what just meets the eye. I saw a connection between her and Van Gough when he drew the painting and what she thought he was thinking. She created her own version and her own story behind what Van Gough was thinking when he was drawing the painting. They say a picture is worth a thousand words, she tried to sum up those words and make a poem out of it.
Then, after we discussed the poem in class and went even further than we had before, I found it even more. This poem to me, was wrapped in layers, and I had to slowly unwrap each one. I found out she committed suicide. This made my head go spinning. Suicide? And that got me to thinking that maybe this poem was about her suicide. Maybe this poem is about her trying to tell people how she was feeling, desperately reaching out for someone to understand her and help. She was talking about How she wanted to die, but she writes it like this: "This is how
I want to die"
She makes I want to die it's own separate line. Maybe this is me trying to make everything fit together, but it seemed like she wanted people to know she felt like dying.
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Reading Respone to "Youth in Revolt"
Youth and Revolt is a book by the author C.D Payne about an adolescent boy getting through his adolescent and doing adolescent things...kind of. He isn't what you would call a "normal" kid. He does and thinks about things a little differently then other adolescent boys, or at least just me. As of right now I'm in about the middle beginning of the book. In this part of the book the character, named Ned, has his first girlfriend whom he met on a vacation with his family. He had the most amazing time while he was there but now that he has left, he has to try to work through a long distance relationship. He has to take care of the dog she hates, go to a bad public school, try to get his girlfriend to satisfy his needs, fake his friends suicide, and keep his life together all in one. You can say Ned has his plateful dealing with everything.
Although this book might seem a bit weird and a bit unorthordox to most, I really really like it. I can really connect to it. Although i don't think like Ned, it's all very similar. Its just a book about a teenage boy doing teenage boy stuff. Thinking about girls, doing things for girls (in Ned's case taking care of a dumb dog), doing stupid things, getting angry at your parents and your sister, and eating doughnuts. Lots of doughnuts.
One thing I really like about this book is that it's real. It doesn't try to get soft around the edges, it doesn't try to make Ned's mind less perverted, and doesn't try to make Ned's mom seem less stupid. It's real with you. It gives you things straight with you and that's something hard to come by these days. People a lot of the time aren't real with you, I know I'm not real all the time. It's something I feel like should be really appreciated.
All in all I really like this book and can't wait to finish it and find out all that is going to happen.
Although this book might seem a bit weird and a bit unorthordox to most, I really really like it. I can really connect to it. Although i don't think like Ned, it's all very similar. Its just a book about a teenage boy doing teenage boy stuff. Thinking about girls, doing things for girls (in Ned's case taking care of a dumb dog), doing stupid things, getting angry at your parents and your sister, and eating doughnuts. Lots of doughnuts.
One thing I really like about this book is that it's real. It doesn't try to get soft around the edges, it doesn't try to make Ned's mind less perverted, and doesn't try to make Ned's mom seem less stupid. It's real with you. It gives you things straight with you and that's something hard to come by these days. People a lot of the time aren't real with you, I know I'm not real all the time. It's something I feel like should be really appreciated.
All in all I really like this book and can't wait to finish it and find out all that is going to happen.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Response to responses
1st response
I felt like Sarah's response to "My Papa's Waltz" was a very well thought out response which talked about many different issues and, at least in my opinion, responded and discussed each issue thoroughly and deeply. She really went into each individual topic and talked about all the different sides of the issue talking about why each issue is relevant and gave examples supporting each idea. For the most part also she did a good job of being as little bias as possible
2nd response
Another blog post i really liked, and that i thought was very interesting, was Tomin's response to "Please don't take my air jordans". What i liked about it so much was that it displayed his opinions and thoughts on the poem. Usually, when people talk about pieces of literature (including myself) just kind of brief over about what they thought on it and get into some big ideas about it. Tomin on the other hand laid it all out to, he told you exactly what he thought of it and backed it with examples from the poem and other ideas.
3rd response
The third poem I really liked and I thought was very well written was Julia's response to "Please don't take my air jordans". The reason why I liked Julia's response so much was because you could tell she really put a lot of time and effort into making. And I really appreciate that sort of thing. Lots of people, including myself again, just try to do the bare minimum and leave it at that. Julia went above and beyond what she was supposed to do. She talked about and discussed each little thing and each idea in the poem and I liked it a lot
I felt like Sarah's response to "My Papa's Waltz" was a very well thought out response which talked about many different issues and, at least in my opinion, responded and discussed each issue thoroughly and deeply. She really went into each individual topic and talked about all the different sides of the issue talking about why each issue is relevant and gave examples supporting each idea. For the most part also she did a good job of being as little bias as possible
2nd response
Another blog post i really liked, and that i thought was very interesting, was Tomin's response to "Please don't take my air jordans". What i liked about it so much was that it displayed his opinions and thoughts on the poem. Usually, when people talk about pieces of literature (including myself) just kind of brief over about what they thought on it and get into some big ideas about it. Tomin on the other hand laid it all out to, he told you exactly what he thought of it and backed it with examples from the poem and other ideas.
3rd response
The third poem I really liked and I thought was very well written was Julia's response to "Please don't take my air jordans". The reason why I liked Julia's response so much was because you could tell she really put a lot of time and effort into making. And I really appreciate that sort of thing. Lots of people, including myself again, just try to do the bare minimum and leave it at that. Julia went above and beyond what she was supposed to do. She talked about and discussed each little thing and each idea in the poem and I liked it a lot
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)